| | R v ROR |  |
|
|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
IcemaN
Site Staff
Posts : 172
Join date : 2011-08-01
Location : Everywhere & No where
|  Subject: Re: R v ROR  Sun Jun 16, 2013 12:31 am | |
| | |
|
| | |
Phantom
Member
Posts : 354
Join date : 2011-08-09
Location : Germany
| | Subject: Re: R v ROR Sun Jun 16, 2013 12:40 am | |
| No, 3-0.
Somebody from R left before 4th map so they wanted to forfeit the map and count it as 3-0. | |
|
| | |
IcemaN
Site Staff
Posts : 172
Join date : 2011-08-01
Location : Everywhere & No where
| | Subject: Re: R v ROR Sun Jun 16, 2013 1:22 am | |
| I lagged out & came back less than 2 min later. 2-0-1. You can't call forfeit when someone lags out before the map starts | |
|
| | |
Mike
Admin
Posts : 310
Join date : 2011-08-01
Age : 32
Location : Boston, MA
| | Subject: Re: R v ROR Sun Jun 16, 2013 1:59 am | |
| Did someone from R actually tell you that they wished to forfeit Coruscant? I think with the current rules you guys must play the forth map to decide the point totals. | |
|
| | |
wow
Member
Posts : 127
Join date : 2011-08-01
| | Subject: Re: R v ROR Sun Jun 16, 2013 2:01 am | |
| RoR banned from bfc for lying about other team forfeit. | |
|
| | |
Fir3hazard
Member
Posts : 226
Join date : 2012-06-25
Age : 26
Location : Canada, BC
| | Subject: Re: R v ROR Sun Jun 16, 2013 3:15 am | |
| I thought Iceman had left after the third map.
I had to go at that moment anyways so I decided to call a forfeit on the map. | |
|
| | |
{ѕтя}σвℓινιση
Member
Posts : 329
Join date : 2012-08-21
Age : 28
Location : In your mom.
| | Subject: Re: R v ROR Sun Jun 16, 2013 5:01 am | |
| | |
|
| | |
IcemaN
Site Staff
Posts : 172
Join date : 2011-08-01
Location : Everywhere & No where
| | Subject: Re: R v ROR Sun Jun 16, 2013 6:05 am | |
| If Fire said to count it as a forfeit then I apologise.
GG | |
|
| | |
Phantom
Member
Posts : 354
Join date : 2011-08-09
Location : Germany
| | Subject: Re: R v ROR Sun Jun 16, 2013 8:49 am | |
| Don't worry, I wouldn't call it a forfeit if you didn't ask for it  | |
|
| | |
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: R v ROR | |
| |
|
| | |
| | R v ROR | |
|
